Company vs Company

Syngenta sues BASF to stop US launch of Ridivex corn herbicide

The Swiss crop-protection group says BASF’s new product copies a patented herbicide-and-safener combination behind its own Storen, and wants it kept off the market before the autumn selling season.

A self-propelled agricultural sprayer driving through a field of young corn
A sprayer working a corn field; the lawsuit concerns competing pre-emergence corn herbicides. Photo: Pl77 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

In brief

  • Syngenta filed a patent infringement suit against BASF Agricultural Solutions US in federal court in Delaware on 14 July 2026.
  • It says BASF’s Ridivex, which pairs pyroxasulfone with the safener isoxadifen-ethyl, infringes US Patent No. 8,404,618 linked to its Storen herbicide.
  • Syngenta filed for a preliminary injunction the next day.
  • It seeks lost profits or at least a reasonable royalty.

Syngenta has taken BASF to court in the United States to block the launch of a new corn herbicide. Two Syngenta crop-protection units sued BASF Agricultural Solutions US in the federal district court in Delaware on 14 July 2026, alleging that BASF’s Ridivex infringes a patent tied to Syngenta’s competing Storen product, according to the court docket and Bloomberg Law.

Ridivex combines the herbicide pyroxasulfone with a safener that Syngenta identifies as isoxadifen-ethyl, a chemical that protects the corn crop while the herbicide kills weeds. Syngenta says that combination is covered by its US Patent No. 8,404,618.

A race against the selling season

Syngenta moved quickly. The docket shows it filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, with a sealed opening brief, on 15 July, and BASF was served the next day. According to a report by Milling MEA citing Reuters, Syngenta told the court the US Environmental Protection Agency could approve Ridivex within days, and argued that a launch during distributors’ June-to-September buying window could displace Storen before sales to growers begin.

Beyond an injunction, Syngenta is asking for lost profits or, at a minimum, a reasonable royalty. No public response from BASF was included in the reports reviewed by TradeWar.

Why it matters

Pre-emergence corn herbicides are a large and competitive market, and new formulations are one of the few ways crop-protection companies win share from rivals. A preliminary injunction would be a significant early win for Syngenta; a refusal would let BASF sell while the case runs, which can take years.

In crop chemicals the calendar is a weapon: a product that misses the distributor buying season can lose a whole year of sales.

What to watch

  • The court’s ruling on Syngenta’s preliminary injunction motion.
  • BASF’s answer to the complaint and any challenge to the validity of the patent.

How we got here

  1. 14 Jul 2026Syngenta files patent suit in Delaware
  2. 15 Jul 2026Syngenta moves for a preliminary injunction
  3. 16 Jul 2026BASF Agricultural Solutions US is served
  4. 6 Aug 2026BASF’s answer due under the docket schedule

Sources

TradeWar wrote this article from the public reporting and documents below. Figures and statements are attributed in the text.

  1. Syngenta Patent Suit Seeks to Block New BASF Corn Herbicide (1) Bloomberg Law, 16 Jul 2026
  2. Syngenta Crop Protection AG v. BASF Agricultural Solutions US LLC - 1:26-cv-00859 IPverse (GreyB) docket, 16 Jul 2026
  3. Syngenta takes BASF to court over U.S. herbicide patent dispute Milling MEA, 24 Jul 2026