Company vs Company

Adidas takes its stripes fight with Thom Browne to the US Supreme Court

After losing at trial and on appeal, adidas has asked the justices to revive its case over Thom Browne’s four-bar design, pointing to emails that surfaced in a UK case.

A white adidas Superstar trainer with three black stripes in an open blue shoebox on a red shirt
An adidas Superstar with the brand’s three stripes. Adidas says Thom Browne’s parallel stripes infringe that mark. Photo: halfrain / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0

In brief

  • Adidas filed a petition with the US Supreme Court on 28 September, docketed as No. 26-445, after two extensions of its deadline.
  • A Manhattan jury ruled in January 2023 that Thom Browne’s four-bar stripes do not infringe adidas’s three-stripe mark.
  • Adidas sought a new trial over emails that came to light in a parallel UK case; the trial judge refused and the Second Circuit upheld that refusal.
  • The Supreme Court has not yet decided whether to hear the case.

Adidas has asked the US Supreme Court to revive its long-running trademark case against American designer Thom Browne. Its petition, filed on 28 September and docketed as No. 26-445, came after Justice Sonia Sotomayor twice extended the filing deadline over the summer.

The dispute is over stripes. Adidas says Thom Browne’s parallel bars on sportswear are too close to its three-stripe mark; Thom Browne uses four bars, along with a striped grosgrain ribbon, as its signature.

How the case got here

Adidas sued in 2021. In January 2023 a Manhattan jury found that Thom Browne’s designs did not infringe and awarded adidas nothing. Thom Browne’s lawyers had pointed to a 2007 arrangement between the companies over its striped branding.

Adidas then asked for a new trial, arguing that Thom Browne had withheld internal emails relevant to whether it knew its stripes could cause confusion. The emails had surfaced in a similar case in the UK. Thom Browne denied hiding documents. A federal judge in New York refused a new trial in 2024, and the Second Circuit has since upheld that refusal, according to case summaries.

What adidas is asking for

The petition asks the justices to take up the new-trial question. The Supreme Court hears only a small share of the cases it is asked to review, and it has not yet indicated whether it will consider this one.

After five years, the fight is no longer about stripes on a hoodie but about what happens when evidence turns up too late.

What to watch

  • Whether Thom Browne files a response or waives it, and when the justices consider the petition.
  • The parallel UK proceedings over adidas’s three-stripe registrations.

How we got here

  1. 2007Adidas and Thom Browne reach an arrangement over Browne’s striped branding.
  2. 2021Adidas sues Thom Browne in New York.
  3. Jan 2023Jury finds no infringement.
  4. 2024Trial judge refuses adidas a new trial over withheld emails.
  5. 28 Sep 2026Adidas files its Supreme Court petition, No. 26-445.

Sources

TradeWar wrote this article from the public reporting and documents below. Figures and statements are attributed in the text.

  1. Docket No. 26A46: adidas America, Inc. v. Thom Browne, Inc. (application to extend time) Supreme Court of the United States, 11 Aug 2026
  2. Adidas’ request for new trial in Thom Browne stripes lawsuit denied Fashion Dive, 6 May 2024
  3. Thom Browne Triumphs in adidas’ Battle Over Stripes Highsnobiety, 12 Jan 2023