Company vs Company

Red Cat’s trade-secret case against ex-CTO’s drone start-up moves forward

A Utah federal judge refused to throw out most of the military drone maker’s claims against George Matus and Vector Defense, sending the dispute towards discovery.

Two soldiers seen from behind watching a small drone fly over a field, one holding a tablet controller
US Army soldiers training with a small reconnaissance drone; the type of battlefield quadcopter at the centre of the dispute, not a Red Cat or Vector Defense aircraft. Photo: U.S. Army photo by Pfc. Nathan Arellano Tlaczani / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain

In brief

  • Senior US District Judge Ted Stewart largely denied motions to dismiss filed by George Matus and Vector Defense.
  • Trade-secret, fiduciary-duty, computer-fraud, tortious-interference and non-compete claims will proceed.
  • A claim that Matus lured about nine engineers away was dismissed for lack of detail, along with a Utah computer-abuse claim.
  • Matus founded Teal Drones, sold it to Red Cat in 2021 for $10m and later served as Red Cat’s chief technology officer.

A legal fight between two American military drone makers will move into discovery after a federal judge in Utah rejected most of the defendants’ attempts to have it thrown out. Senior US District Judge Ted Stewart ruled in late September that Red Cat Holdings and its subsidiary Teal Drones can pursue trade-secret claims against their former technology chief, George Matus, and his new company, Vector Defense.

The decision was reported by Courthouse News, as summarised by Briefly, on 28 September, and by Law360 on 30 September. Court records list the case under the federal law allowing injunctions against trade-secret misappropriation.

From founder to rival

Matus founded Teal Drones in 2014 and sold it to Red Cat in 2021 for $10m. He then ran Teal and served as Red Cat’s chief technology officer before announcing his departure in 2024. Red Cat alleges he used those roles to set up Vector Defense while still employed, giving the new company what it calls a “built-in blueprint on ideal drone composition” and sparing it normal development costs. Red Cat also alleges that a Croatian drone sale Matus was negotiating collapsed without explanation.

What survived and what did not

Claims for trade-secret misappropriation against both defendants will go ahead, as will claims for breach of fiduciary duty and fraudulent misrepresentation against Matus, a federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claim, tortious interference, and breach of the non-compete clause in Matus’s contract.

The judge dismissed a claim that Matus breached a non-solicitation clause by prompting about nine drone engineers to join Vector, saying Red Cat had not given enough detail. A claim under Utah’s computer-abuse law was also dismissed. The ruling follows an earlier setback for Red Cat, when the same judge refused a preliminary injunction, finding no proof of irreparable harm and noting a dispute over whether the two companies actually compete.

None of Red Cat’s allegations has been proven, and the defendants contest them.

As Pentagon demand for small drones grows, the engineers who design them have become the most contested asset in the industry.

What to watch

  • Whether Red Cat refiles the dismissed claims with more detail.
  • Evidence in discovery on whether Vector Defense competes for the same military customers.

How we got here

  1. 2014George Matus founds Teal Drones
  2. 2021Red Cat buys Teal Drones for $10m
  3. 2024Matus announces his departure
  4. Late Sep 2026Judge lets most of Red Cat’s claims proceed

Sources

TradeWar wrote this article from the public reporting and documents below. Figures and statements are attributed in the text.

  1. Red Cat Holdings Matus Trade Secret Claims: Judge Rejects Dismissal Briefly (citing Courthouse News Service), 28 Sept 2026
  2. Military Drone Makers’ Trade Secrets Suit Survives Dismissal Law360, 30 Sept 2026
  3. 25-646 - Red Cat Holdings Inc. et al v. Vector Defense Inc. et al GovInfo, 30 Sept 2026